I  U  P  A  C




News & Notices

Organizations & People

Standing Committees




. . CI
. . PAC
. . Macro. Symp.

. . Books
. . Solubility Data



Links of Interest

Search the Site

Home Page


Pure Appl. Chem. Vol. 74, No. 8, pp. 1435-1441 (2002)

Pure and Applied Chemistry

Vol. 74, Issue 8

Lycopene, tomato products, and prostate cancer prevention. Have we established causality?*

Elizabeth C. Miller1, Craig W. Hadley2, Steven J. Schwartz2, John W. Erdman, Jr.3, Thomas W.-M. Boileau4, and Steven K. Clinton1, **

1Division of Hematology and Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; 2Department of Food Science and Technology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; 3Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA; 4Department of Human Nutrition and Food Management, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

Abstract: The relationship between tomato products and prostate cancer prevention has been the subject of increasingly intense research activity over the past decade. The hypothesis that tomato products contain phytochemicals, perhaps lycopene and others, that modify prostate carcinogenesis warrants investigation. However, scientists, regulatory agencies, marketers of products, and those defining public health policy have differing opinions regarding the strength of the data when applied to criteria for inference and causality. It is useful to briefly review these criteria and discuss the relative strengths and weaknesses of the published data in order to better define future directions for research. Accepted categories of criteria include: consistency, strength of association, biological gradient, temporality, specificity, biological mechanisms and coherence, and experimental evidence. We believe that continued support for research regarding tomato products, lycopene and other phytochemicals, and prostate cancer risk is warranted and may ultimately serve as the basis for more consistent public health recommendations for the consumer. But, what do we say to the public when the data is still inconclusive? The authors support the recommendation that a minimum of five servings of fruit and vegetables should be consumed daily from a variety of sources. We believe that the hypothesized benefits of tomato products for prostate cancer prevention may be achieved with approximately five servings of tomato products per week. The consumption of lycopene supplements is not currently recommended for prostate cancer prevention or therapy. Future research will allow us to provide more definitive guidelines.

** Corresponding author.

*Lecture presented at the 13 th International Symposium on Carotenoids, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 6-11 January 2002.
Other lectures are published in this issue, pp. 1369-1477

Page last modified 18 September 2002.
Copyright © 2002 International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry.
Questions or comments about IUPAC, please contact, the Secretariat.
Questions regarding the website, please contact web manager.